Improving the Reliability of the LED Bulb Measurement System
Corressponding author's email:
anhvan@hcmute.edu.vnDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2026.2232Keywords:
Quality control, Integrating sphere, Measurement system, Đèn Led Bulb, Poka-YokeAbstract
This study addresses deviations in optical parameters and inconsistencies in the light-quality control process for LED Bulb products at Center X of Corporation Y. It aims to identify the root causes of measurement errors and develop a standardized measurement system to improve the accuracy and reliability of product data prior to shipment. To achieve this objective, the study employed Pareto analysis to determine the most critical defect categories and measurement system analysis to isolate major sources of variation within the existing process. The results indicated that errors related to luminous flux and correlated color temperature accounted for 83.23% of total nonconformities, highlighting these factors as the dominant quality issues. In addition, the initial overall variation of the measurement system was 35.51%, exceeding the acceptable threshold specified in the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) guidelines and indicating a serious limitation in measurement capability. To address this issue, Poka-Yoke error-proofing was introduced through fixed-position markers on the lamp-holder mounting rod, along with the standardization of operating procedures. Following implementation, the overall variation index of the measurement system was reduced to below 10%. These findings demonstrate that standardizing measurement capability can establish a reliable data foundation for product quality assurance and support research and development in sustainable lighting technologies.
Downloads: 0
References
C. Zhang and Y. Chen, “A review of research relevant to the emerging industry trends: Industry 4.0, IoT, blockchain, and business analytics,” Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 165–180, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500192
T. A. V. Nguyen, D. Tucek, N. T. Pham, and K. H. Nguyen, “Quality 4.0 practices toward sustainable excellence in the manufacturing sector,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 35, no. 13–14, pp. 1593–1610, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2024.2383616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2383616
T. A. V. Nguyen, K. H. Nguyen, and T. M. H. Nguyen, “Quality 5.0: Sustainable Quality Management System for Future,” Journal of Quality, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 343–373, 2025, doi: 10.6220/joq.202510_32(5).0002.
N. K. Hieu, N. T. A. Van, D. Khuu, and T. M. H. Nguyen, “Applying Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Improve Productivity: Case Study at a Mooncake Production Enterprise,” Management and Production Engineering Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.24425/mper.2025.154933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2025.154933
L. Wilkinson, “Revising the Pareto chart,” The American Statistician, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 332–334, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152243
AIAG, Measurement Systems Analysis Reference Manual, 4th ed. Southfield, MI, USA: Automotive Industry Action Group, 2010.
A. Chaturvedi, N. Joshi, S. R. Bapat, and S. Nadarajah, “Control charts for the percentiles of an inverse Pareto distribution under complete and middle-censored data,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1971–1984, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3754
V. Kumar, V. Aryal, H. Jum’ah, J. Kula, and S. Ganesan, “Optimizing unsatisfactory Pap test result rate through root cause analysis and creative adaptation of fishbone diagram: A quality improvement initiative,” Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, vol. 14, no. 5, p. S63, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.07.107
M. Al-Rifai, “Unlocking insights: Evaluating 5Whys methodology for root cause analysis and employee problem-solving skills in 91 case studies,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1276–1304, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2024-0077
P. Gangidi, “A systematic approach to root cause analysis using 3 × 5 why’s technique,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 295–310, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2017-0114
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technical Education Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.


