Assessing Students’ Entry-Level Competency Using Bloom’s Taxonomy in the Machine Manufacturing Project
VERSION OF RECORD ONLINE: 18/09/2025
Corressponding author's email:
phuoctv@hcmute.edu.vnDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2025.1866Keywords:
Bloom's taxonomy, The machine manufacturing project, Education quality, Input of education quality, Output of education qualityAbstract
The machine manufacturing technology project is a critical course that students majoring in machine manufacturing technology must complete before graduation. However, a current issue is the low percentage of students completing this project on time, which significantly impacts their academic progress and the university’s training schedule. This study focuses on assessing students’ competency at the beginning of the course using Bloom’s taxonomy to determine their readiness in relation to the expected learning outcomes. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining both qualitative and quantitative survey instruments, along with a retrospective analysis of students’ weekly progress throughout the 10-week course. A total of 111 students who had recently completed the course participated in the study. The findings indicate that most students’ entry-level competencies fall between Level 2 (Understanding) and Level 3 (Applying), whereas the course is designed with intended learning outcomes at Level 4 (Analyzing). This gap suggests that learners require additional support, particularly during the early stages of the course. The results reveal that current student preparedness does not fully meet the expected standards, highlighting the need to enhance pre-course learning pathways and provide supplementary instruction. The methods and findings of this research can serve as a foundation for evaluating and improving the quality of instruction in other project-based courses within engineering education programs.
Downloads: 0
References
C. H. Nguyen, “Exploring internal challenges for quality assurance staff in vietnam: voice of insiders,” Quality Assurance in education, vol. 29, no. 2/3, pp. 70–83, 2021.
P. T. Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T. Nguyen, L. T. Nguyen, and V. D. B. Huynh, “Factors affecting vietnamese higher education quality in the context of industry 4.0,” Vietnam Journal of Education, pp. 225–237, 2022.
O. M. Rezeanu, “The implementation of quality management in higher education,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 1046–1050, 2011.
M. Tsinidou, V. Gerogiannis, and P. Fitsilis, “Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study,” Quality assurance in Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 227–244, 2010.
H. Yin, J. Han, and B. E. Perron, “Why are chinese university teachers (not) confident in their competence to teach? the relationships between faculty-perceived stress and self-efficacy,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 100, p. 101529, 2020.
M. M. A. Musthafa and K. Sajila, “Reconsidering the teaching–research nexus in higher education,” Higher Education for the Future, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2014.
C. S. Sarrico and A. A. Alves, “Academic staff quality in higher education: an empirical analysis of portuguese public administration education,” Higher education, vol. 71, pp. 143–162, 2016.
N. Bouranta, “Does transformational leadership influence tqm practices? a comparison analysis between manufacturing and service firms,” The TQM Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 706–728, 2020.
S. Sahney, D. K. Banwet, and S. Karunes, “An integrated framework of indices for quality management in education: a faculty perspective,” The TQM journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 502–519, 2008.
Y. Hill, L. Lomas, and J. MacGregor, “Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education,” Quality assurance in education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2003.
R. Telford and R. Masson, “The congruence of quality values in higher education,” Quality assurance in education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 107–119, 2005.
G. Boccuzzo and M. Gianecchini, “Measuring young graduates’ job quality through a composite indicator,” Social Indicators Research, vol. 122, pp. 453–478, 2015.
L. N. Dac and N. L. Van, Hướng dẫn thiết kế đồ án Công nghệ Chế tạo máy. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học và Kỹ thuật, 2006.
B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longman New York, 1956.
J. A. C. Koru and A. R. Aqil, “Theory-informed course design: Applications of bloom’s taxonomy in undergraduate public health courses,” Pedagogy in health promotion, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2022.
T. T. T. Trang and R. B. Baldauf, “Demotivation: Understanding resistance to english language learning-the case of vietnamese students,” The journal of Asia TEFL, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 79–105, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Technical Education Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.


