Didactics in the Context of Education 5.0 at the Higher Education Level
Corressponding author's email:
chidp@hcmute.edu.vnDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2025.1666Keywords:
Didactics, Education 5.0, Learning objectives, Teaching methods, AssessmentAbstract
Society 5.0 has set the requirements for the Education 5.0 era with the application of advanced technologies and active learning methods to promote personalized, learner-centered learning. Using the qualitative approach and theoretical research methods, analysis, synthesis and generalization to build a theoretical framework on didactics in Education 5.0 at the higher education level, the article identifies the concept and characteristics of Education 5.0, analyzes the changes of didactics in the Education 5.0 era at the higher education level. Accordingly, the training objectives (learning outcomes) do not stop at training professional competence but also aims at digital capacity, critical thinking, creativity, adaptability, social-emotional capacity; Training content needs to be integrated digital skills and modules on systematics thinking, critical and creative thinking and soft skills; Teaching and learning methods need to change towards gamification, project-based learning, action-oriented learning, experiential learning... through online (synchronous/ asynchronous) teaching, direct teaching with the application of advanced technology (artificial intelligence - AI, virtual reality - VR, augmented reality – AR, blockchain...), blended learning, open society curriculum; assessment content and tools are diverse corresponding to training objectives, with the application of digital tools.
Downloads: 0
References
D. D. Nguyen, “Japan’s Society 5.0,” VNU Japan Vietnam University, accessed Oct. 6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://vju.ac.vn/en/japans-society-5-0/.
N. Minh, “Education 5.0 - Challenges and opportunities for students,” Giao Duc, accessed Oct. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://giaoduc.net.vn/giao-duc-50-thach-thuc-va-co-hoi-cho-sinh-vien-post242675.gd.
IFI-BRAIN, “International Conference ‘Higher Education 5.0: Innovation and Adaptation for the Future,’” accessed Oct. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ifi.vnu.edu.vn/vi/news/DAAS-2024/Hoi-thao-quoc-te-Giao-duc-dai-hoc-5-0-doi-moi-va-thich-ung-vi-tuong-lai-1597.html.
Foreign Policy, “How Japan is Preparing its Students for Society 5.0,” accessed Oct. 6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://foreignpolicy.com/sponsored/how-japan-is-preparing-its-students-for-society-5-0/.
L. Judijanto, L. Ili, and M. G. Wardhana, “Education 5.0: Collaboration and creativity in improving students' digital intelligence,” International Journal of Social and Education (INJOSEDU), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 682-693, Jun. 2024.
H. Al-Fayyadh, S. G. Ali, and D. Abood, “Modelling an Adaptive Learning System Using Artificial Intelligence,” Webology, accessed Oct. 1, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/101446056/20211224121454pmWEB19001.pdf.
M. Alafnan and S. MohdZuki, “Do artificial intelligence chatbots have a writing style? An investigation into the stylistic features of ChatGPT-4,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0267
Sydle, “Education 5.0. What does it mean? How does it work?” accessed Oct. 2, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sydle.com/blog/education-5-0-61e71a99edf3b9259714e25a.
S. Ahmad, S. Umirzakova, G. Mujtaba, M. S. Amin, and T. Whangbo, “Education 5.0: Requirements, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions,” arXiv, accessed Oct. 1, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.15846.
N. S. Raj and V. Renumol, “A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020,” Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 113–148, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00199-4
D. Herro, C. Quigley, J. Andrews, and G. Delacruz, “Co-measure: developing an assessment for student collaboration in steam activities,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 4, pp. 1–12, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z
A. Alam, “Cloud-based e-learning: Scaffolding the environment for adaptive e-learning ecosystem based on cloud computing infrastructure,” in Computer Communication, Networking and IoT: Proceedings of 5th ICICC 2021, vol. 2. Springer, 2022, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1976-3_1
A. D. Lantada, “Engineering education 5.0: Continuously evolving engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1814–1832, 2020.
A. Kirkwood and L. Price, “Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’and how do we know? A critical literature review,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 6–36, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
M. Al-Emran, S. I. Malik, and M. N. Al-Kabi, “A survey of internet of things (IoT) in education: Opportunities and challenges,” in Toward Social Internet of Things (SIoT): Enabling Technologies, Architectures and Applications. Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24513-9_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24513-9_12
M. Simon, “Four elements of higher education as student self-formation,” in Research Handbook on the Student Experience in Higher Education, 2023, pp. 41–57. doi: 10.4337/9781802204193.00011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204193.00011
S. M. S. Latif, “Adequate Characteristic of Higher Education in India,” International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), vol. 5, no. 3, Mar.-Apr. 2021.
T. A. Anoshkova, “The characteristics of the US higher education and its distinguishing features,” Journal Вісник, pp. 1-6, May 2015.
Vietnam Prime Minister, “Decision on the National Qualification Framework,” issued Oct. 18, 2016.
Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation, University of Toronto, “Developing Learning Outcomes,” accessed Oct. 7, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://teaching.utoronto.ca/resources/dlo/.
C. Lawless, “Synchronous vs Asynchronous Learning: Which is Right for Your Learners?” LearnUpon, accessed Oct. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.learnupon.com/blog/synchronous-learning-asynchronous-learning/.
D. P. Chi and H. Anh, “Bases, models and some tools for implementation of online teaching in interactivity,” Journal of Technical Education Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education (JTE), vol. 75B, Feb. 2023.
M. Sacher, N. Vaughan, “A blended approach to Canadian First Nation Education,” in Proceedings of International Conference E-learning, Portugal, pp. 21-28, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch018
K. H. Suzuki, “Learning and Education Lab in Society 5.0,” accessed Oct. 6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.kri.sfc.keio.ac.jp/en/lab/society-5-0/.
M. Papastergiou, “Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation,” Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
H. Hosseini, M. Hartt, and M. Mostafapour, “Learning is child’s play: Game-based learning in computer science education,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3282844
B. Meier and N. V. Cuong, Theory of Technical Teaching – Methods and Teaching Process. C Eigenverlag, Berlin, 2011.
D. P. Chi, Action-Oriented Teaching - Bases and Applications. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House, 2020.
D. T. K. Oanh, Competence-Based Teaching in Higher Education. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House, 2023.
N. N. M. Kamal, A. H. Mohd Adnan, A. A. Yusof, M. K. Ahmad, and M. A. Mohd Kamal, “Immersive interactive educational experiences–adopting Education 5.0, Industry 4.0 learning technologies for Malaysian universities,” in Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, pp. 190–196, 2019.
R. G. R. Baiocchi et al., “Exploring data-driven youth character education frameworks: A systematic literature review on learning analytics models and participatory design,” ESE. Estudios sobre educación, 2019.
E. Kurilovas, “On data-driven decision-making for quality education,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 107, p. 105774, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.003
S. Ganahl, C. Ploder, T. Spiess, T. Dilger, and R. Bernsteiner, “How data-driven decision-making can be optimized by linking CRM and ERP data - a teaching case,” in INTED2023 Proceedings. IATED, pp. 127–132, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.0062
B. Kye, N. Han, E. Kim, Y. Park, and S. Jo, “Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations,” Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, vol. 18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
N. V. Tuan, Didactics. Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, 2009.
N. V. Khoi, Theory of Teaching Technical Practice. Pedagogical University Publishing House, 2013.
D. T. K. Oanh, Didactics and Teaching Theory. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Technical Education Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.
