Application Entropy Weighting and Simple Additive Weighting Methods for Ranking Load in Microgrid
Online First: 24/08/2026
Email tác giả liên hệ:
ntan@hcmute.edu.vnDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2026.1989Từ khóa:
Microgrid, Load Ranking, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Simple Additive Weighting, Entropy Weighting MethodTóm tắt
This paper presents the Entropy Weighting method combined with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) technique to determine the optimal load among multiple loads, serving the purposes of load ranking in a Microgrid system, taking into account the priority of supply reliability. Load ranking is essential for evaluating the importance level of each load in the power system, thereby enhancing the operational efficiency of the Microgrid. The Entropy Weighting method is employed to determine the objective weights of each criterion based on the degree of dispersion of the criteria in the decision matrix, followed by the application of the Simple Additive Weighting method to calculate the final priority weight of each load. This weighting approach is straightforward to implement and helps to minimize the subjectivity of decision-makers, thereby improving the reliability of the ranking results. The computational results, applied to the IEEE 16-bus Microgrid model, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Tải xuống: 0
Tài liệu tham khảo
S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
T. G. Tran et al., “Application of the Fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP VIKOR Method to Rank Loads for Load Shedding in Microgrids,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 16727–16735, 2024, doi: 10.48084/etasr.7857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7857
W. K. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, “The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy,” Control and Cybernetics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 445–469, 2006.
M. Homayounfar, M. Fadaei, H. Gheibdoust, and H. R. Rezaee Kelidbari, “A systematic literature review on MOORA methodologies and applications,” Iranian Journal of Operations Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 164–183, 2022.
S. Chakraborty, “Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 54, nos. 9–12, pp. 1155–1166, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0
J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega, vol. 53, pp. 49–57, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
T. A. Nguyen, T. N. Le, H. A. Quyen, H. H. Pham, and T. N. T. Huynh, “Ranking load in microgrid system based on the priority weight calculation of power supply,” Journal of Technical Education Science, no. 68, pp. 18–26, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.54644/jte.68.2022.1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.68.2022.1079
T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: RWS Publications, 1996.
F. Li, K. K. Phoon, X. Du, and M. Zhang, “Improved AHP method and its application in risk identification,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 312–320, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605
C. C. Lin, W. C. Wang, and W. D. Yu, “Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3),” Automation in Construction, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 180–187, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.004
C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 379–423, Jul. 1948, doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Q. Bao, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, and F. Yang, “Can entropy weight method correctly reflect the distinction of water quality indices?,” Water Resources Management, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 3667–3674, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11269-020-02641-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02641-1
I. T. Jolliffe, “Principal component analysis,” in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, M. Lovric, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011, pp. 1094–1096, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_455
I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, “Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2065, Apr. 2016, Art. no. 20150202, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, “Methods for multiple attribute decision making,” in Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1981, pp. 58–191, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
F. Ulum, J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and R. Aryanti, “Selection of the best e-commerce platform based on user ratings using a combination entropy and SAW methods,” Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 44–53, 2024, doi: 10.61944/bids.v3i2.92.
A. Cahyapratama and R. Sarno, “Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simple additive weighting (SAW) methods in singer selection process,” in Proc. 2018 Int. Conf. Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2018, pp. 234–239, doi: 10.1109/ICOIACT.2018.8350707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT.2018.8350707
W. B. Zulfikar, A. Wahana, D. S. Maylawati, I. Taufik, and H. S. Hodijah, “An approach for teacher recruitment system using simple additive weighting and TOPSIS,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 434, no. 1, Art. no. 012059, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012059
X. Wang and Z. Yang, “Application of fuzzy optimization model based on entropy weight method in atmospheric quality evaluation: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, Art. no. 2143, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11072143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072143
M. Bhatia and A. Williams, “Selection of criteria using MCDM techniques—An application in renewable energy,” arXiv:2303.17520, Mar. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.17520.
T. Temucin, “Multi-criteria decision making: A cast light upon the usage in military decision process,” in Research Anthology on Military and Defense Applications, Utilization, Education, and Ethics. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2021, pp. 469–497, doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9029-4.ch026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9029-4.ch026
S. Ouyang, Z. W. Liu, Q. Li, and Y. L. Shi, “A new improved entropy method and its application in power quality evaluation,” Advanced Materials Research, vols. 706–708, pp. 1726–1733, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.1726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.1726
U. I. Arsyah, N. Jalinus, S. Syahril, A. Ambiyar, R. H. Arsyah, and M. Pratiwi, “Analysis of the simple additive weighting method in educational aid decision making,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 2389–2396, 2021, doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i14.10664.
A. Afshari, M. Mojahed, and R. M. Yusuff, “Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem,” International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 511–515, Dec. 2010.
S. Wijayanto, D. Napitupulu, K. Adiyarta, and A. P. Windarto, “Decision support system of new student admission using analytical hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1255, no. 1, Art. no. 012054, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1255/1/012054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1255/1/012054
D. W. T. Putra and A. A. Punggara, “Comparison analysis of simple additive weighting (SAW) and weighted product (WP) in decision support systems,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 215, Art. no. 01003, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201821501003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821501003
A. T. Nguyen, T. N. Le, H. A. Quyen, M. V. N. Hoang, and P. B. L. Nguyen, “Application of AHP algorithm to coordinate
multiple load shedding factors in the microgrid,” IETE Journal of Research, pp. 1–13, Aug. 2021, doi:
1080/03772063.2021.1962744
T. A. Nguyen et al., “Applying fuzzy VIKOR algorithm in load ranking for load shedding problem in microgrid,” in Proc. 2023 Int. Conf. System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2023, pp. 271–275, doi: 10.1109/ICSSE58758.2023.10227249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSE58758.2023.10227249
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Kỹ Thuật
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép quốc tế Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeri Phái sinh 4.0 .
Bản quyền thuộc về JTE.
